Go package comparison

jwtauth vs hanko

Compare two Go packages using the same scoring model: maintenance, adoption, security, maturity, developer experience, and data confidence.

Quick Decision

jwtauth currently leads this comparison by the weighted health model.

95

jwtauth

JWT authentication middleware for Go HTTP services

95
Maintenance 95
Adoption 100
Security 92
Maturity 100
Developer DX 77
Confidence 95

hanko

Modern authentication, on your terms. Open source alternative to Auth0, Clerk, WorkOS, Stytch.

90
Maintenance 95
Adoption 91
Security 92
Maturity 81
Developer DX 81
Confidence 95

Metric Table

side by side
Metric jwtauth hanko Lead
Health 95 90 jwtauth
Maintenance 95 95 Tie
Adoption 100 91 jwtauth
Security 92 92 Tie
Maturity 100 81 jwtauth
Imported by6970jwtauth
Stars6408.9Khanko
Last activity1 day agoTodayReview dates
Known vuln records00Tie

Choose jwtauth if

You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.

Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.

Choose hanko if

You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.

Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.