golang-jwt vs hanko
Compare two Go packages using the same scoring model: maintenance, adoption, security, maturity, developer experience, and data confidence.
Quick Decision
golang-jwt currently leads this comparison by the weighted health model.
golang-jwt
Package jwt is a Go implementation of JSON Web Tokens: http://self-issued.info/docs/draft-jones-json-web-token.html
hanko
Modern authentication, on your terms. Open source alternative to Auth0, Clerk, WorkOS, Stytch.
Metric Table
side by side| Metric | golang-jwt | hanko | Lead |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health | 96 | 90 | golang-jwt |
| Maintenance | 95 | 95 | Tie |
| Adoption | 100 | 91 | golang-jwt |
| Security | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Maturity | 94 | 81 | golang-jwt |
| Imported by | 15.1K | 0 | golang-jwt |
| Stars | 9.1K | 8.9K | golang-jwt |
| Last activity | 2 days ago | Today | Review dates |
| Known vuln records | 0 | 0 | Tie |
Choose golang-jwt if
You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.
Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.
Choose hanko if
You prefer its current score profile and the package fits your framework or API style.
Its maintenance, adoption, and security signals match your project risk tolerance.